HCM460 M2 CSU Establishing Strategic Leadership Team

PERSONAL LEADERSHIP IN NURSING
November 30, 2020
Baker College Emergent and Infection Diseases Annotated Bibliography
November 30, 2020

Scenario: You have been functioning in your COO role for several months and have a relatively solid understanding of the leadership styles present in the organization. The CEO has requested that you develop a strategic leadership team to design the new 5-year strategic plan for the organization. He would like you to assess the different styles of leadership present in the organization and how these styles would complement one another as a synergistic team. The CEO would also like you to search strategic leadership models present in other industries (e.g., business) and whether there are take-aways from these models that would be appropriate for the healthcare setting. Is transformational leadership the only effective leadership style? How do leadership styles complement one another? What leadership styles would be beneficial for the strategic leadership team?

Requirements:

  • The memo should be at least 1, but no more than 2 pages, single-spaced.
  • Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings.
  • You need to cite at least 3 sources for this assignment, outside of the textbook. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. is a great place to find resources. Your paper must be formatted according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
  • If you need assistance with your writing style, start with the links under the Research Help and Writing Help tabs on the CSU-Global Library’s homepage (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

HCM460 Mod 2 CT

HCM460 Mod 2 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 75.0

The post HCM460 M2 CSU Establishing Strategic Leadership Team first appeared on The Nursing Tutors.

 

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"

Law Writers